John Stossel
  • February 11, 2010 06:40 AM UTC by John Stossel

    Forced Unionization

    Diet All in the FamilyMichelle Berry runs a day-care business out of her home in Flint, MI. She thought that she owned her own business, but Berry's been told she is now a government employee and union member. It's not voluntary. Suddenly, Berry and 40,000 other Michigan private day-care providers have learned that union dues are being taken out of the child-care subsidies the state sends them. The "union" is a creation of AFSCME, the government workers union, and the United Auto Workers.

    This racket means big money to AFSCME, which runs the union, writes the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a free-market think tank.

    Today the Department of Human Services siphons about $3.7 million in annual dues to the union….

    The money should be going to home-based day-care providers — themselves not on the high end of the income scale. Ms. Berry now sees money once paid to her go to a union that does little for her…

    Patrick Wright, a lawyer for the Macknac Center, says the union was forced on the women after a certification election conducted by mail in which only 6,000 day-care providers out of 40,000 voted. Wright told me his clients, like Berry, say they were "shocked" to learn they were suddenly in a union.

    They want nothing to do with the union. One of my clients has said, “Look, this is my home, I’m both labor and management here.” They’ve wanted nothing to do with this union and don’t think that it has any purpose besides than to siphon money away from them.

    Michigan isn't the only state funding unions this way.

    Fourteen states have now enabled home-based day-care providers to be organized into public-employee unions, affecting about 233,000 people.

    Mackinac sued Michigan on behalf of the day-care owners, but the case was dismissed. They have appealed. Neither Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, the Department of Human Services, nor the union would talk to me about this. Last month, Michigan Rep. Justin Amash proposed a law that would end "stealth" unionization of private entrepreneurs.

    We’ll talk more about unions in tonight’s show on Fox Business at 8pm and 11pm ET.

bmatty

While this is definitely wrong, how can you complain if you are taking subsidies from the state? Isn't that how they get the dues, but deducting them from the subsidies? If you don't want to be part of the union, stop taking money from the state.

February 11, 2010 at 12:26 pm

Rick

Well, I guess the libs don't need card check after all. How could this happen in America?

February 11, 2010 at 12:25 pm

Steve

The Unions are the real puppet masters now. It's incredible to see how they are behind the scenes on almost every issue. But, per usual, we'll just roll over and take it. This is why so many people are so cynical about government these days.

February 11, 2010 at 12:21 pm

R.O. in E.H.

Thank goodness unionization has been forced upon this day care provider! She is probably too stupid to realize that the brilliant people who run the unions are Better Qualified to spend that money than she is! And besides, it really isn't that much money - she won't even miss it. But seriously, the result will be more expensive day care for everyone. Another "hidden tax" on those who can't afford it!

February 11, 2010 at 12:17 pm

Jan

The unions have always work for their conrads the Democratic party. Now, with the current admin, this is their chance.

February 11, 2010 at 12:17 pm

infinitewisdom4u

this is obviously becoming a trend. if we can't get people to actually choose unionization, then we will trick them or, in the event the "free choice" bill gets passed, intimidate them into unionization. would like to see more information on how this tactic got started and who is behind it. it's NOT a grassroots grown effort.

February 11, 2010 at 12:15 pm

Aardvark

Why would they talk to you about it? It is shakedown just like the good old Mafia and they weren't very talkative either.

February 11, 2010 at 9:14 am

Corey in GA

There's a reason it was called the UNION of Soviet Socialist Republics. Until people realize that unions cause as much instability as executives in the economy, unions and executives will fight to each take more and more of the average person's wages for their own uses. Unions and excessive regulations cooperate to destroy small business, the key the success of this country.

February 11, 2010 at 9:08 am

Greg

Welcome to the price of "free" subsidies. The government has you by the hairs; you just don't know until they flex them.

February 11, 2010 at 9:02 am

Miasmark

Unionizing an entire industry should never be an option. I don't know what high these unions are on.

February 11, 2010 at 8:48 am

Jay

Many businesses have left this state(MI)/country due to over regulation & taxation at the local,state, & federal levels. Business here flat out SUCKS.Not just recently,the last 10 years.Republicrats propose cutting taxes, which would be great but is only a 1/4 of the problem. They don't talk about getting rid of govt departments and state agencies, which would result in limited govt and spending in the mitten. We need some clown suits for these MI politicians so they can be better understood.

February 11, 2010 at 8:46 am

About this Web Site

  • John Stossel joined FOX Business and FOX News in October 2009. His show, Stossel, airs on the Fox Business Network on Thursdays at 9 PM and midnight ET. It re-runs Fridays at 10 p.m., Saturdays at 9 p.m. and 12 midnight, and Sundays at 10 p.m. (all times eastern).

    He is the New York Times best-selling author of Give Me A Break and Myths, Lies and Downright Stupidity. His "Give Me a Break" commentaries take a skeptical look at a wide array of issues, such as education, the economy, parenting, and more.

    Subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog.